Orthopedic Stem Cells seeing rapid growth in the US

Orthopedic Stem Cell Use in the U.S. Projected to Rise as Competition in the Market Intensifies; Led by NuVasive (press release)
According to a recent report by iData Research, the buzz over orthopedic stem cells is reflected in their rapid growth. In 2014 alone, the orthopedic stem cell market grew by more than 17%.
According to a recently published report by iData Research , the orthopedic stem cell market was the fastest growing orthopedic biomaterial segment in the US. It aims to provide greater osteoinductive and osteogenesis properties compared to other bone grafts, therefore improving bone repair. These stem cells are currently only being used for spinal procedures, specifically lumbar and cervical indications. But the market may experience further growth as more competitors join the market and as education about stem cell use improves allowing other indications to become approved by the FDA.
“Orthopedic stem cells’ higher average selling price is better tolerated by the commercialized nature of the spine market, explains Dr. Kamran Zamanian, CEO of iData. “As new stem cell products and innovations enter the market, prices should decline, which will aid in greater adoption and in turn fuel the number of procedures using stem cell bone grafts.”
Other key findings from the 2015 iData Research report series entitled U.S. Market for Orthopedic Biomaterials:
Aging Population Use of Stem Cells
With regards to the incidence of osteoarthritis and degenerative joint disease, the aging population is a driver for stem cell therapies, as it is for the orthopedic market in general.
High Cost of Development
Cell-based therapies are generally very costly. Developing a viable stem cell product is currently prohibitively expensive. Definitions and protein markers that help distinguish types of stem cells are often challenging to develop, as these cells change in various clinical settings. The potential reward is appreciable for end-users, but the cost of research and development is a considerable burden for entrants. This will hinder further market growth.
Leading Competitors
NuVasive led the U.S. orthopedic stem cell market in 2014. They are currently shifting their sales efforts to their second-generation product Osteocel® Plus. NuVasive purchased the Osteocel® line of products from Osiris Orthopedics in 2008. The purchase was to complement their strong spinal hardware business.
Other notable competitors in the orthopedic stem cell market include Orthofix, Biomet, RTI Surgical, and AlloSource.
For Further Information
More on the orthopedic stem cell market in the U.S. can be found in the report published by iData entitled U.S. Market for Orthopedic Biomaterials. This report also covers the U.S. market segments for orthopedic bone graft substitutes, orthopedic growth factors, orthopedic stem cell therapy, orthopedic hyaluronic acid viscosupplementations, orthopedic cartilage repairs, and spinal machined bone allografts.
Full reports also provide a comprehensive analysis including units sold, procedure numbers, market value, forecasts, as well as detailed competitive market shares and analysis of major players’ success strategies in each market and segment. To find out more about U.S. orthopedic biomaterials market data or procedure data, register online or email us at info(at)idataresearch(dot)net for a U.S. Market for Orthopedic Biomaterials report brochure and synopsis.
About Procedure Tracker
Additional procedure number data is available from iData’s Procedure Tracker service, which allows subscribers to define and analyze procedure data segmented by country, region, hospital, surgery centre, and physician. A customizable dashboard sorts procedure data for further analysis and research.
About iData Research
iData Research (http://www.idataresearch.com) is an international market research and consulting group focused on providing market intelligence for medical device and pharmaceutical companies. iData covers research in: Spinal Implants and VCF, Spinal MIS, Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair and Regeneration, Orthopedic Trauma, Large & Small Joints, Anesthesiology, Wound Management, Orthopedics, Cardiovascular, Ophthalmics, Endoscopy, Gynecology, Urology and more.

Read More

AAOS: Time for orthopedics to jump on the value-based care bandwagon

AAOS: Time for orthopedics to jump on the value-based care bandwagon (The Advisory Board Company)
Navigating the transition to value-based care is now a top priority for orthopedic physicians, vendors, and strategic planners. That’s the message that our team received when we attended the annual meeting of The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) a few weeks ago.
Read on to learn how these three stakeholders are responding to value-based initiatives to drive orthopedic value and growth.
Physicians respond to CJR
This was the first AAOS annual meeting since CMS finalized the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model—and physicians were clearly both excited and somewhat apprehensive about the model, which went into effect on Friday.
At one session on emerging payment models, the presenting physicians offered a set of guiding principles to successfully execute on bundled payment:

Minimize LOS: Because hospital and post-acute stays put patients at risk for hospital-acquired conditions, physicians must strive to minimize the time their patients spend in institutions to both control cost and boost outcomes.
Reduce variation: Efficiency and quality are essential to success under bundled payment. Standardization around clinical best practice and care pathway redesign simplify care and reduce outcome disparities.
Keep protocols simple: While it may be tempting to optimize every detail of patient care, overly complex protocols reduce compliance and increase the administrative burden on physicians.

What we’ve heard from current Medicare bundled payment participants validates these principles. To learn more about strategies to guide your transition to bundled payment, readKey Considerations for Success Under Joint Replacement Bundled Payment.
Vendor innovation refocuses on value
With this renewed emphasis on value, vendors increasingly look to support providers through solutions aimed at care pathway optimization and outcomes tracking.
In fact, a number of vendors have prioritized care pathway and patient flow innovations alongside traditional capital and device introductions. For example, DePuy Synthes announced a partnership with Value Stream Partners, an organization with experience helping Medicare bundled payment participants, to offer support targeted to providers with orthopedic bundled payment contracts
Similarly, FORCE-TJR, a joint replacement registry that collects data on patient risk factors and patient-reported outcomes, has begun offering data collection and analysis services for providers. Using these services, providers can estimate patient risk before surgery and track outcomes against registry benchmarks.
As value-based payment continues presenting new challenges to providers and reduces demand for costly capital technologies, we expect vendors to continue innovating around value-focused solutions.
Planners look beyond surgery for orthopedic value
Although orthopedic surgery was the primary focus of the conference, population health and total cost control also emerged as priorities for planners. As uptake of value-based payment continues, planners will need to find new ways to reduce unnecessary spending and keep orthopedic patients healthy.
During a session on geriatric care, presenters from Regions Hospital presented on its mobile outreach program for elder health care. The program approaches fragility-related fractures as a “sentinel event,” which triggers a multidisciplinary healing and prevention program. Through the mobile outreach program, Regions offers orthopedics telehealth consults with an NP and onsite visits for at-risk patients living in nursing facilities.
These services have a dual purpose: help patients recover after they suffer a fracture due to bone fragility, and prevent future fractures. As a result, they keep patients out of the ED and prevent future surgeries, keeping overall costs down.

Read More

3-D Printing in Orthopedics – Experts discuss the best applications and limitations

Despite a few drawbacks, 3-D printing has some promising clinical applications (Healio Orthopedics Today)
See ALL 3-D stories
See 3D Print Manufacturers 
When 3-D printers were first developed about 30 years ago, the technology had limited capabilities and were large and cost prohibitive. Now that the technology has shrunk both in size and its cost, 3-D printing is more usable across a broad range of fields, including medicine. More orthopaedic surgeons are harnessing the power of 3-D printing to improve their knowledge of anatomy and pathology and, ultimately, to achieve more consistent surgical results.
Orthopaedics Today Europe spoke to some experts in this area about current and future clinical trends in and applications for 3-D printing, as well as the lingering ethical and regulatory questions surrounding this technology. It is clear that 3-D printing is changing the practice of orthopaedics in some ways, according to sources for this article.
“Overall, 3-D printing allows you to visualize and, in some cases, practice surgical procedures for patients who have complex deformities or injuries in a way that we could not do before,” Jason L. Koh, MD, of Northshore University Health System, in Evanston, Ill., USA, said. “It is transformative in the sense that basically, our imaging was always in two dimensions, and now we can have real 3-D models that we can hold and manipulate. That allows us to have something that, in many cases, is probably closer to the reality of what we have to do in treating the patient.”
Jason L. Koh
Also known as additive manufacturing, 3-printing has been around since the 1980s. The process involves creating a 3-D, solid object from a digital model. The digital model is usually created using a computer-aided design program. In orthopaedics, that requires data from MRI or CT scans. Once the digital model is complete, it is sliced into thin cross-sections that are layered one after another until the object is completed.
Although many materials can be used in a 3-D printer, some common materials used in orthopaedics are sintered powdered metal, stainless steel, nitinol, titanium and ceramic, according to information from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Current applications in orthopaedics
There are several current applications of 3-D printing in orthopaedics. The technology, for example, is used to print custom cutting guides that may help improve surgical planning and accuracy.
“Patients then effectively get a premium product because they are getting technology applied to their case that allows the surgeons to achieve their plan with greater accuracy than would otherwise be possible,” Justin P. Cobb, MD, of the Imperial College London, in London, told Orthopaedics Today Europe.
With 3-D planning, the surgeon knows how to position and orient the components before entering the OR, according to Cobb. This type of planning also ensures the implant is the proper size so there are no surprises in the OR, he noted.
Justin P. Cobb
“I personally 3-D plan every single joint replacement that I do as sort of a quality statement,” Cobb said. Globally, however, fewer than 10% of all total joint operations are planned this way, he added.
There are many opportunities for 3-D printing to improve the outcomes of total knee replacement, according to Cobb.
“More people are having MRIs of their knee, for instance, which potentially will show how the damage is localized,” he said. “The MRI not only gives information for 3-D printing of the guides to perform the surgery, but also is objective evidence preoperatively that a total knee replacement is needed.”
The technology is helpful for surgeons when they encounter uncommon orthopaedic problems.
“Personally, I have used it on occasions for patients with trochlear dysplasia,” Koh told Orthopaedics Today Europe. “This is a procedure that you cannot replicate on most normal patients [or] practice on your regular Sawbones or cadaveric specimens because of the fact that the deformity is so unusual.”
Three-dimensional printing has demonstrated its utility in the hip as well, according to Koh. Surgeons at his institution have used this technology for complex revision total hip replacement, in which the acetabulum is damaged.
“[3-D printing] allows us to go into a complex procedure with a unique anatomy being confident and comfortable,” Koh said. “It is so much easier to sort of figure out exactly where we are making cuts or placing hardware, rather than trying to do that for the first time when actually looking at it.”
In addition, he said 3-D printing accelerates component placement.
“There are some data showing it speeds the ability to place the component accurately,” Koh said. “It is useful for fracture cases where you know you have multiple fragments that you are trying to figure out.”
Spine cage production
Based on presentations at recent meeting and the literature, this technology is well-suited for spine applications.
“At the moment, I used 3-D-printed implants for cages for the disc space in terms of fusion and spondylolisthesis,” Ralf Wagner, MD, of Ligamenta Spine Center, in Frankfurt, Germany, said.
He recently began using the 3-D printed EndoLIF implant (Joimax), which is a titanium implant created using Electron Beam Melting (EBM) technology.
Ralf Wagner
“It is a titanium alloy,” Wagner told Orthopaedics Today Europe. “The advantage is you have a good surface of titanium, which allows you to have a good in-growth without having a lot of bone substitute or bone material.”
The preliminary results with this approach after 1.5 years indicate there is good bone in-growth, without the need to use a bone substitute, and high primary stability, according to Wagner.
“I was afraid in the beginning there would be some kind of stability problem compared to a single piece of metal, but at the moment, I have not seen any breakages or any problems with that,” he said.
Complex spine deformity, fracture treatment
Three-dimensional printing is also used in complex spinal deformity cases, especially when severe curves occur not just in the sagittal or coronal planes, but also in the rotational plane, according to Koh. The literature shows 3-D printing helps some orthopaedic surgeons and traumatologists with fracture repair. Italian researchers used 3-D printed models of distal radius and scaphoid fractures to better understand the resultant fracture patterns. They were able to learn more about the lesions, as well as better plan their surgical repair, with the help of 3-D printing.
In their study, Shuang and colleagues demonstrated 3-D printed osteosynthesis plates were safe and effective in the treatment of intercondylar humeral fractures. They also noted there was a significantly shorter operative time when they used these plates.
Downsides to 3-D printing
While 3-D printing offers many opportunities, there are some drawbacks. The printers are slow, for instance, building at a rate of cubic millimeters per minute, according to Brian Derby, FIMMM, a professor at the University of Manchester, in Manchester, United Kingdom.
“Typically, using current technology, if you wanted to make something the size of a golf ball, you would be talking about some hours to make it,” Derby said. “You can print material like bone, you can print something like a blood vessel, but each of those objects [multiplies] up the time of making it.”
Printing 3-D, living tissue or body parts is complex, according to Derby.
“If you are going to print something the size of an organ or a piece to go into an organ, you have to put a billion cells into it,” he said. “If you are trying to precisely make something, with all the cells in the right place, you have got to make a billion positioning decisions.”
Furthermore, to use the technology requires a certain degree of technical expertise.
“[It requires] a certain amount of technical proficiency in order to take the data and then essentially subtract out the things you do not want,” Koh said. “Northshore University Health System has an informatics group, and so they are able to do that kind of processing for us, [and] a number of implant manufacturers do that kind of processing routinely for some of these customized joint replacements.”
There are also regulatory issues with regard to 3-D printing that sources who spoke with Orthopaedics Today Europe mentioned.
“The way [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA and the other regulatory bodies approve things is they want to know that whatever it is you are making is exactly the same every time you make it,” Derby said. “If you are making something which is different every time you make it; how do you define whether that sign of quality ought to be used? [One] will have to rethink how one approves these things.”
Future applications may reduce costs
As this technology evolves and more people use it, the role of 3-D printing medicine is expected to expand.
“It is going to be the path of the future because it is going to improve the reliability and reduce the cost,” Cobb said. “I think every company is going to use it because it will be the only way that they can deliver the quality and the price.”
At some point, this technology may be used to make custom-made implants.
“I think the promise of this technology is maybe you can get implants that are really customized to fit each patient,” Koh said. “Right now, we have custom guides to fit the patients and there are some patient-matched implant companies, but there is the possibility that this could be much more common.”
For this to happen, the informatics must be sophisticated, Koh said. However, 3-D printing still may not produce the once-promised revolution.
“I think you could see how it could revolutionize in certain areas, but I think revolutions rarely happen in medicine,” Derby said. “When penicillin was introduced [it] took 30 years from Fleming [discovering it] to the drug companies producing it. These things take time.” – by Colleen Owens

References:
Bizzotto N, et al. Injury. 2016.doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.01.013.
Miller JS. PLoS Biol. 2014.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001882.
Shuang F, et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016.doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002461.
www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/manufacturing-processing/top-10-materials-3d-printing
www.pcmag.com/encyclopedia/term/37077/3d-printing

For more information:
Justin P. Cobb, MD, can be reached at Imperial College of London, Room 7L25, Floor 7, Laboratory Block, St. Dunstan’s Rd., Charing Cross Campus, London, W6 8RP, United Kingdom; email: [email protected].
Brian Derby, FIMMM, can be reached at School of Materials, University of Manchester, Oxford Rd., Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom; email: [email protected].
Jason L. Koh, MD, can be reached at Northshore University Health System, 1000 Central Station #880, Evanston, IL 60201 USA; email: [email protected].
Ralf Wagner, MD, can be reached at Ligamenta Wagner & Sabljic, Wirbelsäulenzentrum GbR, Walter-Kolb-Str. 9-11, 60594 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; email: [email protected].

Disclosures: Cobb reports he is co-founder of Embody, which specializes in 3-D customization and planning. Derby, Koh and Wagner report no relevant financial disclosures.

Is 3-D printing in orthopaedics the way of the future or is it mainly experimental technology?

Technology offers innovative solutions to old problems
We are all unique. Although we share similarities in our makeup, rarely does a surgeon come across an identical anatomy or a physician see the same response to a certain medication. Three-dimensional printing is a tool that recognizes this and can bring individualized solutions that benefit both patients and doctors.
Jasvinder S. Daurka
It is being used to provide customized composite materials, which can be optimized for their specific use. Biological activity, mechanical strength and dimensions are just a few of the variables that can change for each device made. The printing process itself offers many advantages to traditional manufacturing, particularly in cost and timing.
It is helping surgeons who work in difficult situations to plan their surgery with custom jigs designed off 3-D scans, improving both outcomes and safety.
In a world of nanotechnology, biological composite materials and personalized health care, it is a technology that is in its infancy, but will continue to offer innovative solutions to some old clinical problems, embracing the fact that each situation is different.
Jasvinder S. Daurka, MBChB, is a consultant orthopaedic surgeon at the Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust and is an honorary senior lecturer at the Imperial College London.
Disclosure: Daurka reports no relevant financial disclosures.

More than just an experimental technology
Three-dimensional printing, also known as additive manufacturing, has received increasing interest from the health care sector during the past several years. This is especially true in orthopaedics, where 3-D-printed patient-specific implants are found helpful in certain cases of tumor, trauma, deformity, etc., which involve difficult reconstruction, by providing patients with an individualized solution to their unique circumstances. These niche market conditions represent huge needs that are unmet by products from mass market medical device companies. In addition, compared with conventional techniques, 3-D printing has enabled manufacturing of more desirable ultra-structures that may potentially facilitate osteoinduction and drug delivery. This may be of particular interest to manufacturers from developing countries as 3-D printing can help them achieve the level of precision beyond their previous technical capabilities.
Zhongjun Liu
Three-dimensional printing can be applied to other areas of orthopaedics, including prostheses, surgical templates and preoperative planning, as well as educational tools for patients and students. As of today, 3-D printing is already more than just an experimental technology for orthopaedic surgeons and we should not be surprised to see it becoming more available in the next few years.
However, this is not to say we are advocating for its routine use in every case. After all, one would ideally like to have a suit to be tailor-made, but the department store suit may fit just as well. Most people can run just fine with any pair of running shoes, but there are occasions where footwear prescriptions are helpful and necessary.
Zhongjun Liu, MD, is a professor of orthopaedics at Peking University and chairman of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing.
Disclosure: Liu reports no relevant financial disclosures.

Useful for training
Three-dimensional printing is an interesting new technology that is already widely used in various fields. In orthopaedic surgery, it has been applied to the manufacture of prosthetic components, mostly acetabular cups, starting from a CT scan and then forwarded to the 3-D printer, which converts an image into a 3-D structure. Practically, this is the evolution of the original design and manufacturing digital systems that were used at the end of the 1970s in various laboratories all around the world.
Roberto Binazzi
The advantage of this procedure lies in the exact customization of the implant that is adapted to the patient’s bone and not vice versa. This is particularly important in revision surgery, tumors, trauma, congenital hip disease and in any other situation where we have to deal with more or less severe bone stock loss.
Another interesting application of 3-D printers can be the production of a plastic prototype exactly identical to the bone segment (pelvis, knee, etc.) of patients with severe congenital or acquired deformities. In this way, the surgeon has the possibility of performing a trial operation on the plastic prototype, before dealing with the real deformity. Obviously, this is useful also for teaching purposes. Today, 3-D printing has been adopted by several companies to produce their implants and has been shown to represent great progress in industrial technology.
Roberto Binazzi, MD, is chairman of the Department of Hip Surgery at Villa Erbosa Hospital in Bologna, Italy.
Disclosure: Binazzi reports he is a consultant to LIMA and CeramTec.

Change in surgical practice
Óliver Marín-Peña
Orthopaedic surgery requires an excellent 3-D visualization to perform modern bone reconstruction techniques. Obviously, training improves when you can practice on a real bone model. With a domestic 3-D printer, we can easily reproduce a realistic plastic model from patients’ CT images. That model provides the opportunity to plan surgical steps and to choose the best implant and type of reconstruction for that specific case. Furthermore, we could use it to easily design a cutting template to perform a perfect osteotomy for deformity correction. Current 3-D printing technology offers the surgeon multiple options to train in new surgical techniques, reduce surgical time and perhaps improve clinical results.
We should be aware this technology may change our current surgical practice in the coming years. Our challenge, as orthopaedic surgeons, should be to find clinical applications of 3-D printing and work side-by-side with engineers to achieve these objectives as much as possible and progressively reduce real costs and those related to the time it takes to perform a surgery. We will not shy away from this technology, and we should keep informed of developments in this field to improve our clinical results.
Óliver Marín-Peña, MD, practices in the Hip-Knee Orthopedic Department at the University Hospital Infanta Leonor in Madrid.
Disclosure: Marin-Peña has no relevant financial disclosures.

Read More

SpineSource launches an expandable lumbar interbody cage in the US

SpineSource Launches Expandable Lumbar Interbody Cage in U.S. (OrthoSpineNews)
SpineSource, Inc. announced today the U.S. launch of the L-Varlock Lumbar Cage. The L-Varlock is the only expandable interbody that can adjust in situ from 0° to 24° of lordotic angle and up to 7 mm of expansion.
The L-Varlock is made of titanium alloy and is currently being launched through SpineSource’s independent group of spinal implant sales professionals throughout the United States.
“Once again, it’s back to the future with spine,” said Tom Mitchell, Founder and CEO of SpineSource. “It is now clear that expandable devices are the future of interbody fusion and titanium has made a comeback. With L-Varlock, surgeons can dial-in any custom lordotic angle necessary to restore and maintain sagittal balance and disc height. He added, “I am pleasantly surprised how quickly U.S. surgeons are gravitating back to titanium because of the bone-friendly properties over PEEK.”
Expandable lumbar interbody devices have rapidly been accepted since SpineSource launched the expandable WAVE® Cage manufactured by Advanced Medical Technologies, AG (Germany) in 2009. Medtronic, Inc. acquired the WAVE® in 2012.
 
About SpineSource, Inc.
SpineSource was founded in 2004 when it became the exclusive U.S. distributor for Ulrich GmbH (Germany), launching the expandable VBR and co-founding Ulrich Medical USA in 2006. SpineSource is now the exclusive U.S. distributor for L-Varlock which is imported to the USA by Eden Spine LLC and manufactured by Kisco International.
For more information, visit www.spinesource.com or contact SpineSource at (636) 532-9300 or email at [email protected]
Just to add a little more about SpineSource outside of the attached:
Based in the St. Louis suburb of Chesterfield, MO., SpineSource has a rich history spanning more than a decade of introducing new spinal implant technologies to the United States from Europe.
It started in 2004 with the Ulrich (Germany) Expandable Vertebral Body Replacement (VBR): the first dial-in expandable VBR in the nation.  Many competitors have since introduced this technology.
Then in 2008: the first steerable TLIF from Advanced Medical Technologies, AMT, Germany (LOOP) followed by the first ever expandable lumbar interbody device made of PEEK (WAVE).  Ulrich Medical eventually bought our business after just 18 months on the market, forming their own US subsidiary in Chesterfield, MO.  Then in 2012, Medtronic acquired AMT outright and purchased the US business for WAVE and LOOP devices.  Many competitors have now launched expandable interbody devices.
Today, we start our ‘back to the future’ launch of expandable TITANIUM lumbar interbody fusion devices called L-Varlock (France).  We will see how we do.  What is great about this device is the amount of sagittal balance it can restore and the amount of disc height it can help distract and maintain until a fusion takes place.

Read More

Tiger is moving to full-time Executive Recruiting

This is a rare personal article to my readers.  I never write about myself, but I have a special announcement. 
I am jumping back into full time recruiting in Orthopedics and Spine.
Don’t worry, I will continue the blog – OrthoStreams is 10 years running now.
 
So here is the more detailed update, I have officially left Ellipse Technologies after a successful exit with a buyout from NuVasive acquisition.  NuVasive is a great company that has come from nowhere in 1999 to the 3rd largest player in spine today.  And now they are branching into new areas with the Ellipse acquisition. The integration of NuVasive/Ellipse has started. “NuVasive Specialized Orthopedics” now has installed a brass cheetah in the lobby now and painted the wall purple.
But its time for me to move on and move back to Austin to jump back into full time recruiting again.
email:  [email protected]
Best,
–Tiger
 

Read More

Technology, Startup News, Career Advice & More

Archives

Pin It on Pinterest

Menu