The most incredible Orthopedist you'll ever read about

THE MOST INCREDIBLE ORTHOPEDIST YOU’LL EVER READ ABOUT (Orthopedics This Week)

Wikipedia page
“Hasta la vista, baby.”
The day that Munjed Al Muderis, M.D. fled his native Iraq he held in his heart a vision of a future à la The Terminator. Dr. Al Muderis, now an internationally acclaimed surgeon and developer of the Osseointegration Prosthetic Limb, was on the run from Saddam Hussein’s government.
He told OTW, “I was happy in Iraq. I had always dreamt of being a surgeon. At the age of 12 I saw The Terminatorand I was transfixed by the medical possibilities of technology. ‘I want to make those limbs for people!’ I thought. Witnessing the agony of so many Iraqi veterans only strengthened my resolve to go in this direction.”
Then one day he arrived at work only to be asked to perform an outrageous, revolting task. “I was a resident at Baghdad University Hospital. One day Saddam’s Republican Guards descended upon the hospital with three busloads of military defectors. The surgical team was instructed to surgically remove the ears of each of these men. When the chief surgeon protested, he was dragged outside and killed. Then the soldiers asked if there were any other complaints.”
“I managed to escape the room and hid in the female restroom for five hours. It was five hours of hellish shock. All of a sudden my life was turning from that of a comfortable surgical resident to one of a fugitive.”
“I fled to Jordan, where I falsified a passport and had the good fortune to have someone remove my name from the security system for a brief period of time. If the border guard had suspected anything I would have been shot on the spot.”
Just a Refugee…
From there Dr. Al Muderis went to Malaysia, then Indonesia, and finally took a boat to Christmas Island in Australia—a boat packed with 165 other refugees. “We ended up in a detention center in Western Australia where we were stripped of our names and assigned numbers. I was number 982; the experience was hellish.”
Years later, Dr. Al Muderis is comfortably ensconced in Australia. He is now sought after—you might say “courted”—by the military establishment because he’s got the talent and technology they need. But back in those days he was just trying to make it to safety. “The guards put me in isolation for 40 days because they were trying to break me; knowing that this was their purpose made me determined to survive. During the time I was locked in this windowless 1.5meter/2.5meter cell I did have access to an anatomy book and was able to pass the primary surgical fellowship exam immediately after I left the detention center.”
…Headed for Destiny
Fast forward to the present. Munjed Al Muderis has taken a technology pioneered in Germany and Sweden, and began implementing his childhood vision of helping amputees. “In contrast to traditional prosthesis, the OPL Osseointegration Prosthetic Limb gives amputees a natural loading of the femur and hip joint, something that helps them avoid bone atrophy and eventual osteoporosis. I simplified the original design and approach, and cut the rehabilitation period from 18 to 3 months only. The Swedes were doing the surgery in two stages; the patient has to wait six to nine months before the second stage of the procedure, during which time he or she is in a wheelchair. This new way is one operation, then three days after the patient start learning how to walk again.”
“The initial design of the German implant was made of chrome cobalt alloy material (I changed it to titanium which is more biocompatible). The initial implant had a macroporous spongy surface structure, which allows good bony penetration, but doesn’t provide initial stability due to its cylindrical structure so they added an external bracket to the implant to provide initial stability. This created a major problem with infection as the bracket caused an area where there was major friction with the soft tissue, which lead to frequent infections.”
Improving the Design to Address Muscle Groups
“I changed the design to make the proximal half of the implant containing sharp fins to enable cutting grooves in the bone. This provides initial rotational stability and the distal part of the new implant has a rough surface coating (plasma sprayed) allowing good bony ingrowth; the distal part of the implant is flared to provide an initial axial stability.
“Another feature in the new implant design in case of a short residual femur is the capability of the implant to place a lag screw across the femoral neck to provide for further stability and to protect against fracture of the neck of femur.”
As for how he improved the surgical technique, Dr. Al Muderis stated, “Reduction of the soft tissue at the distal end of the stump dramatically reduces the movement and friction with the implant this reduces the chance of infection. The management of the skin opening where the implant protrudes externally is done in a way that the skin is sutured to the bone so as to minimize or even eliminate any contact between the soft tissue and the implant. This technique reduces infection dramatically. The neuromas that contribute to the phantom limb pain and sensation are appropriately addressed and excised to reduce the symptoms caused by them.”
“The muscle groups were not addressed and often they used to be left as they were post amputation. I improved on the surgical technique by regrouping the muscles around the bone residual end in a more anatomical and functional fashion to give the best chance of the patient to operate the leg as close as possible to pre injury state.”
Making Prosthetics Osseointegrative
At this point, there are a mere four surgeons worldwide performing Dr. Al Muderis’ osseointegration procedure. The British Ministry of Defence is hoping to change that. “They are spending nearly $3,000,000 on trials involving 20 amputees. I have trained five British surgeons; we will perform the surgeries and monitor those 20 cases for two years. We are in the process of setting up similar projects in Canada and Houston, Texas.”
Several Americans have traveled to Australia to undergo osseointegration. Fred Hernandez did just that three years ago. He told OTW, “I was a senior in high school when I fell asleep at the wheel and ended up under a semi truck. When I had a traditional prosthesis I had significant tension in my back and lots of headaches from all the tightness. Because the socket pushed out and up on one side. Now my stance is square and I no longer experience tension in my back or headaches.”
“For 28 of the 30 years that I have been an amputee I used traditional socket technology. My aging skin was breaking down more and more; I was uncomfortable and in pain. As an above knee amputee you bear your weight on the inner groin and the ischial bone. Walking around like that means that it constantly rubs and the skin breaks down, resulting in sores. Osseointegration has meant an enormous leap in my quality of life.”
Dr. Al Muderis, reflecting on his proudest moment as an orthopedic surgeon, noted, “My first osseointegration surgery on a British soldier who had lost both of his legs above the knee. The day he walked into his yard at home after this surgery his wife and five year old son were peering out the window. The patient’s wife said, ‘Look. Here comes Daddy.’ The boy replied, ‘That’s not Daddy. Daddy doesn’t walk.”
A sharp mind—accompanied by a big heart—has taken Dr. Al Muderis far. These days, he is the ambassador for the Australian Red Cross. “I help keep refugee issues in the press by promoting the Red Cross via all aspects of media. I also participate in my professional capacity as an orthopaedic surgeon in Red Cross activities where needed in disaster zones. In addition, I speak to local audiences in Australia to raise awareness about the worldwide refugee crisis.”
Clearly, he will never forget how he reached this point in his life. Asked what he would like people to know about refugees, he stated, “Just like all of humanity you have human beings amongst the refugees who are ‘the good, the bad, and the ugly.’ They are, naturally, a slice of the community. Listen…people wouldn’t be refugees if things were OK where they were because the risks involved in leaving home are horrific. They deserve a second chance.”
And then, sometimes, they can pay it forward.

Read More

The #1 Debated Issue in Total Knee Arthroplasty

#1 Debated Issue in Total Knee Arthroplasty Is… (Orthopedics This Week)
When joint replacement luminaries gather ‘round at the upcoming American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) meeting, Jay Lieberman, M.D., chair of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at the Keck School of Medicine of USC and outgoing president of the American Academy of Hip and Knee Surgeons, will be stirring the pot with a panel discussion on “Great Debates in Total Knee Arthroplasty.”
Dr. Lieberman told OTW, “One of the biggest issues in the total joint replacement is whether or not to resurface the patella. Generally speaking, in the U.S., the majority of the patellas are resurfaced; in Europe it is the opposite.”
“There are three ‘camps:’ those who believe that all patellas should be resurfaced, those who resurface virtually no one, and those who do selective resurfacing. Those who do selective resurfacing make their decisions based on the thickness of the patella, the extent of the degenerative changes, and the overall size and activity level of the patient. Some surgeons are avoiding patellar resurfacing on younger, active patients because they are concerned about loosening and fractures. This apprehension is understandable because we do not have great solutions for treating a loose or fractured patella.”
“Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicate that the results are equivalent between those resurfaced and those not, 10% of patients who do not undergo resurfacing have some type of pain and may require revision. However, just resurfacing the patella may not eliminate the pain. Patients with a resurfaced patella may also complain of pain. Some patients have mild anterior knee pain going up and down stairs, something that may occur because the person’s quadriceps and hamstrings are not strong enough.”
“As for patient selection, one should consider the degeneration of the joint surface of the patella, the thickness of the patella, the patient’s diagnosis, age, weight, and activity level.”
“Going forward, total joint registries will give us more data about how patients are faring; more multicenter RCTs will help us ask more specific questions. Some of these might be: ‘Is it better to avoid resurfacing the patella in younger, active males over 250 pounds?’ ‘What is the outcome of those with a thinner patella who are resurfaced versus those who are not?’ Time—and research—will tell.”
 
 

Read More

New US Patents in Orthopedics… just released this week!

LAST UPDATE – Discontinued

 

PAT. NO.

Title

1
9,814,601

Bi-directional fixating/locking transvertebral body screw/intervertebral cage stand-alone constructs

2
9,814,599

Inter-body implantation system and method

3
9,814,598

Spinal implants and implantation system

4
9,814,596

Method of orienting an intervertebral spacer device having recessed notch pairs by using a surgical tool

5
9,814,595

Multi-walled placeholder

6
9,814,591

Flexible anchoring and fusion devices and methods of using the same

7
9,814,590

In-situ formed intervertebral fusion device and method

8
9,814,589

In-situ formed intervertebral fusion device and method

9
9,814,582

Orthopedic augments having recessed pockets

10
9,814,581

Mobile prosthesis for interpositional location between bone joint articular surfaces and method of use

11
9,814,579

Unlinked implantable knee unloading device

12
9,814,577

Implantable mesh for musculoskeletal trauma, orthopedic reconstruction and soft tissue repair

13
9,814,565

Method for soft tissue repair with free floating suture locking member

14
9,814,547

Method and device for causing tooth movement

15
9,814,539

Methods and apparatus for conformable prosthetic implants

16
9,814,535

Robot guided oblique spinal stabilization

17
9,814,533

Preoperatively planning an arthroplasty procedure and generating a corresponding patient specific arthroplasty resection guide

18
9,814,530

Methods and systems for indicating a clamping prediction

19
9,814,529

Instrument holder and grip for a medical, particularly a surgical, instrument

20
9,814,510

Apparatus and methods for accessing and dilating bone structures using a narrow gauge cannula

21
9,814,509

Bone fracture reduction device and methods for using same

22
9,814,508

Methods and devices for ligament repair

23
9,814,506

Bone implants

24
9,814,505

Calcaneum translation plate

25
9,814,504

Orthopedic plate for use in small bone repair

26
9,814,503

Load sharing bone plate

27
9,814,502

Bone plate and method of use

28
9,814,501

Cannulated telescopic femoral neck screw device and related fixation method

29
9,814,500

Intramedullary nail

30
9,814,499

Intramedullary fracture fixation devices and methods

31
9,814,498

Apparatus and methods for reduction of vertebral bodies in a spine

32
9,814,497

Lumbar spine pedicle screw guide

33
9,814,496

Interspinous stabilization implant

34
9,814,495

Methods, systems and apparatuses for torsional stabilization

35
9,814,493

Trans-iliac connector

36
9,814,492

Variable angle connection assembly

37
9,814,484

Micro debrider devices and methods of tissue removal

38
9,814,475

Customized arthroplasty cutting guides and surgical methods using the same

39
9,814,474

Resection guides, implants and methods

40
9,814,473

Guidance system and method for bone fusion

41
9,814,472

Surgical instrument for removing hook nose bone

42
9,814,471

Glenoid arthroplasty and offset reamers

43
9,814,470

Offset orthopaedic reamer handle

44
9,814,469

Surgical instrument

45
9,814,468

System and method for robotic surgery

46
9,814,459

Suture system

47
9,814,456

Tool useful for implanting a support in treating urinary incontinence in a patient

48
9,814,455

Measuring tool using suture and suture anchor

49
9,814,453

Deformable fastener system

50
9,814,390

Insert imaging device for surgical procedures

Read More

Q&A with 3 men who are revolutionizing Orthopedic training

BLOG: Gain surgical experience from experts (Healio)
———————-Background———————–
Mobile technology has the potential to help educate colleagues around the world through the sharing of cases, images and errors, yet finding a platform on which to do so has been evasive. Enter ICUC, a new iPad app developed strictly for the education of surgeons by other expert surgeons through case-based sharing and commentary. Although only in its infancy, ICUC is an impressive and free app that provides tips, techniques and learning points previously inaccessible in any format.
In many ways, ICUC represents the future of surgical education. With a concept founded by orthopedic surgeons in 2003 and an app launched in 2014, ICUC has a high-quality and intuitive user interface. After selecting a body region from the main screen, the user has access to the ICUC Library. The library includes a continuous and complete registration of surgical procedures performed by a group of selected surgeons. Because all cases are collected during a given period, cases both with and without errors exist.
An overview page for each case includes the AO fracture classification, assessment of outcome, approach and highlights. The entire case can then be downloaded and reviewed. The case is of high quality and includes preoperative imaging (radiographs and CT), intraoperative photographs and fluoroscopy images, and postoperative radiographs and clinical function measurement. As an example of the level of detail, a proximal humerus case we reviewed had more than 170 images and commentary. Of note, the comments are quite honest, and appropriately critical about imperfect techniques or non-ideal outcomes. The amount of information here is extraordinary, with just the proximal homeruns having 49 detailed cases.
The app also includes reference cases with animations representing approaches and treatment techniques. There is also expert opinions with recommendations for various parts of a procedure. Overall, the interface is easy to navigate and when cases are selected and downloaded, they are stored in the “briefcase” for easy access and reference
——————The Interview—————–
We sat down with the three founders of ICUC — Alberto Fernández Dell’Oca, MD; Stephan Perren, MD, DSc (honoris causa); and Pietro Regazzoni, MD — to learn more about the motivation behind this app.  Fernández is professor of Traumatology and Orthopedics at the Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay. He received the TK Innovation Prize from the AO Foundation in 2008 and was selected as member of honor of the SECOT in 2013. Perren is a founding member of the AO Foundation and has been head of the AO Research Center in Davos for 3 decades and chairman of the AO Technical Committee during 2 decades. He is the world’s leading scientific authority on bone biology. Regazzoni is professor at the University of Basel, Switzerland, where he was head of trauma surgery from 1985 to 2008. He is honorary trustee of the AO Foundation and received the AO Recognition Award in 2012.
Orrin I. Franko, MD, and Matthew J. DiPaola, MD: What does ICUC mean and what is its mission?
Alberto Fernández Dell’Oca, MD; Stephan Perren, MD, DSc (honoris causa); and Pietro Regazzoni, MD: The term ICUC stands for “I see, you see,” in reference to the sharing of visual data through case presentations. The ICUC app itself is a learning platform that is based on the concept of complete, reliable and transparent data acquisition and sharing. We believe ICUC presents a unique approach to share and generate new medical knowledge, with the final goal of improving the execution of surgical procedures.
Franko and DiPaola: What inspired you to develop this app?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: The ICUC concept and app were the result of a need for more transparency in orthopedic surgery. This began by introducing the concept of open-source format for publications in 2003, developed by Fernández and Perren, and was the predecessor of the ICUC iBooks, published in 2012. It evolved to the actual iPad application, the “ICUC app,” in 2014.
We realized that the lack of transparent, complete and detailed documentation of surgical cases compromises medical progress. For example, readers of scientific publications can only accept the authors’ conclusions, as they do not have access to the full set of data that the authors used. Moreover, conventional medical teaching tends to forget the gap between planning and outcomes of surgeries. We feel that analyzing shortcomings and problems encountered curing a case provides experience based on understanding with a strong and long-lasting effect. Basically, shortcomings are an excellent source for learning. The technological platform of the iPad allowed us to present data in a way that conventional publications cannot, and being able to compare surgical cases from different medical centers allows the learners to broaden their minds.
Franko and DiPaola: What were greatest challenges faced while creating this platform?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: While there were many challenges in developing this app, one recurrent theme from various hospital sites was the effort needed to convince hospitals to accept the recording of their surgical cases, especially in respect to handling the administrative overhead. Following that, we also had to overcome challenges related to collecting follow-up data for the patients. And, of course, all of these required a significant commitment from surgeons who performed the cases who also accepted to be audited and let us use for free the pictures of their cases, as well as expert surgeons who were asked to review and comment on the cases.
Franko and DiPaola: How do you see this app being utilized by trainees and providers worldwide?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: Orthopedic trainees can easily review cases to learn about potential surgical complications as well as their possible avoidance. Thus, in preparation for surgery, a trainee has the ability to watch an expert surgery from a “front-row” position at home. Similarly, a department chief could use cases from the app for discussions at grand rounds. Ideally, that conversation could be recorded and used for feedback within the app, as well. We anticipate that we might find other ways to use the app, and we welcome other creative uses. We believe this app provides the opportunity to create a strong and lasting contribution to improve orthopedic learning.
We thank the founders for taking the time to share with us about their vision and app creation. Overall, this app represents an extraordinary advancement in surgical education and transparency. The inclusion of a high volume of cases, combined with honest expert opinion, provides the opportunity for enhanced resident and surgeon education that is not limited by geographic barriers. We recommend this app highly for all trainees and surgeons. The app can be downloaded from the Apple App Store here.
Orrin I. Franko, MD, is a PGY5 orthopedic resident at UC San Diego. He has an interest in promoting mobile technology within orthopedic surgery and founded the website www.TopOrthoApps.com to help surgeons and trainees find the most relevant orthopedic apps for their mobile devices. He can be reached [email protected].
Matthew J. DiPaola, MD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation
Shoulder and Elbow, at Wright State Physicians. He can be reached [email protected].
Reference:
Fernández Dell’Oca AA., et al. Open source format publishing of scientific data. 2003; Stuttgart, New-York, Thieme.
Disclosures: DiPaola and Franko report no relevant financial disclosures. Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni are the co-founders of the ICUC medical research group, which produced the ICUC app.

Read More

Q&A with 3 men who are revolutionizing Orthopedic training

BLOG: Gain surgical experience from experts (Healio)
———————-Background———————–
Mobile technology has the potential to help educate colleagues around the world through the sharing of cases, images and errors, yet finding a platform on which to do so has been evasive. Enter ICUC, a new iPad app developed strictly for the education of surgeons by other expert surgeons through case-based sharing and commentary. Although only in its infancy, ICUC is an impressive and free app that provides tips, techniques and learning points previously inaccessible in any format.
In many ways, ICUC represents the future of surgical education. With a concept founded by orthopedic surgeons in 2003 and an app launched in 2014, ICUC has a high-quality and intuitive user interface. After selecting a body region from the main screen, the user has access to the ICUC Library. The library includes a continuous and complete registration of surgical procedures performed by a group of selected surgeons. Because all cases are collected during a given period, cases both with and without errors exist.
An overview page for each case includes the AO fracture classification, assessment of outcome, approach and highlights. The entire case can then be downloaded and reviewed. The case is of high quality and includes preoperative imaging (radiographs and CT), intraoperative photographs and fluoroscopy images, and postoperative radiographs and clinical function measurement. As an example of the level of detail, a proximal humerus case we reviewed had more than 170 images and commentary. Of note, the comments are quite honest, and appropriately critical about imperfect techniques or non-ideal outcomes. The amount of information here is extraordinary, with just the proximal homeruns having 49 detailed cases.
The app also includes reference cases with animations representing approaches and treatment techniques. There is also expert opinions with recommendations for various parts of a procedure. Overall, the interface is easy to navigate and when cases are selected and downloaded, they are stored in the “briefcase” for easy access and reference
——————The Interview—————–
We sat down with the three founders of ICUC — Alberto Fernández Dell’Oca, MD; Stephan Perren, MD, DSc (honoris causa); and Pietro Regazzoni, MD — to learn more about the motivation behind this app.  Fernández is professor of Traumatology and Orthopedics at the Universidad de Montevideo, Uruguay. He received the TK Innovation Prize from the AO Foundation in 2008 and was selected as member of honor of the SECOT in 2013. Perren is a founding member of the AO Foundation and has been head of the AO Research Center in Davos for 3 decades and chairman of the AO Technical Committee during 2 decades. He is the world’s leading scientific authority on bone biology. Regazzoni is professor at the University of Basel, Switzerland, where he was head of trauma surgery from 1985 to 2008. He is honorary trustee of the AO Foundation and received the AO Recognition Award in 2012.
Orrin I. Franko, MD, and Matthew J. DiPaola, MD: What does ICUC mean and what is its mission?
Alberto Fernández Dell’Oca, MD; Stephan Perren, MD, DSc (honoris causa); and Pietro Regazzoni, MD: The term ICUC stands for “I see, you see,” in reference to the sharing of visual data through case presentations. The ICUC app itself is a learning platform that is based on the concept of complete, reliable and transparent data acquisition and sharing. We believe ICUC presents a unique approach to share and generate new medical knowledge, with the final goal of improving the execution of surgical procedures.
Franko and DiPaola: What inspired you to develop this app?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: The ICUC concept and app were the result of a need for more transparency in orthopedic surgery. This began by introducing the concept of open-source format for publications in 2003, developed by Fernández and Perren, and was the predecessor of the ICUC iBooks, published in 2012. It evolved to the actual iPad application, the “ICUC app,” in 2014.
We realized that the lack of transparent, complete and detailed documentation of surgical cases compromises medical progress. For example, readers of scientific publications can only accept the authors’ conclusions, as they do not have access to the full set of data that the authors used. Moreover, conventional medical teaching tends to forget the gap between planning and outcomes of surgeries. We feel that analyzing shortcomings and problems encountered curing a case provides experience based on understanding with a strong and long-lasting effect. Basically, shortcomings are an excellent source for learning. The technological platform of the iPad allowed us to present data in a way that conventional publications cannot, and being able to compare surgical cases from different medical centers allows the learners to broaden their minds.
Franko and DiPaola: What were greatest challenges faced while creating this platform?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: While there were many challenges in developing this app, one recurrent theme from various hospital sites was the effort needed to convince hospitals to accept the recording of their surgical cases, especially in respect to handling the administrative overhead. Following that, we also had to overcome challenges related to collecting follow-up data for the patients. And, of course, all of these required a significant commitment from surgeons who performed the cases who also accepted to be audited and let us use for free the pictures of their cases, as well as expert surgeons who were asked to review and comment on the cases.
Franko and DiPaola: How do you see this app being utilized by trainees and providers worldwide?
Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni: Orthopedic trainees can easily review cases to learn about potential surgical complications as well as their possible avoidance. Thus, in preparation for surgery, a trainee has the ability to watch an expert surgery from a “front-row” position at home. Similarly, a department chief could use cases from the app for discussions at grand rounds. Ideally, that conversation could be recorded and used for feedback within the app, as well. We anticipate that we might find other ways to use the app, and we welcome other creative uses. We believe this app provides the opportunity to create a strong and lasting contribution to improve orthopedic learning.
We thank the founders for taking the time to share with us about their vision and app creation. Overall, this app represents an extraordinary advancement in surgical education and transparency. The inclusion of a high volume of cases, combined with honest expert opinion, provides the opportunity for enhanced resident and surgeon education that is not limited by geographic barriers. We recommend this app highly for all trainees and surgeons. The app can be downloaded from the Apple App Store here.
Orrin I. Franko, MD, is a PGY5 orthopedic resident at UC San Diego. He has an interest in promoting mobile technology within orthopedic surgery and founded the website www.TopOrthoApps.com to help surgeons and trainees find the most relevant orthopedic apps for their mobile devices. He can be reached [email protected].
Matthew J. DiPaola, MD, is an assistant professor in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Medicine & Rehabilitation
Shoulder and Elbow, at Wright State Physicians. He can be reached [email protected].
Reference:
Fernández Dell’Oca AA., et al. Open source format publishing of scientific data. 2003; Stuttgart, New-York, Thieme.
Disclosures: DiPaola and Franko report no relevant financial disclosures. Fernández, Perren and Regazzoni are the co-founders of the ICUC medical research group, which produced the ICUC app.

Read More

Technology, Startup News, Career Advice & More

Archives

Pin It on Pinterest

Menu